Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Refund - amount due was not reflected in the books of account as claims receivable - refund claim was filed about 3 years after the decision of the Tribunal and more than 5 years after the payment of duty - refund not allowed on the ground of period of limitation as well as unjust enrichment - AT
Refund - amount due was not reflected in the books of account as claims receivable - refund claim was filed about 3 years after the decision of the Tribunal and more than 5 years after the payment of duty - refund not allowed on the ground of period of limitation as well as unjust enrichment - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.