Prospective valuation amendment limits reassessment: unamended fair market value reference could not justify reopening based on a registered valuer's ...
Rate of duty - removal of goods in June - Mere fact that the sales invoices were raised in February, 2006, when the goods were exempted, but no removal took place, by itself cannot be held to be shifting the date of removal to February, 2006 - AT
Rate of duty - removal of goods in June - Mere fact that the sales invoices were raised in February, 2006, when the goods were exempted, but no removal took place, by itself cannot be held to be shifting the date of removal to February, 2006 - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.