Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Rate of duty - removal of goods in June - Mere fact that the sales invoices were raised in February, 2006, when the goods were exempted, but no removal took place, by itself cannot be held to be shifting the date of removal to February, 2006 - AT
Rate of duty - removal of goods in June - Mere fact that the sales invoices were raised in February, 2006, when the goods were exempted, but no removal took place, by itself cannot be held to be shifting the date of removal to February, 2006 - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.