Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Exemption u/s 54EC of the Act – there is nothing in the context of section 256(2) to warrant the conclusion that the word 'month' in it refers to a period of 30 days, therefore, refers to six months in Section 256(2) is to six calendar months and not 180 days - AT
Exemption u/s 54EC of the Act – there is nothing in the context of section 256(2) to warrant the conclusion that the word 'month' in it refers to a period of 30 days, therefore, refers to six months in Section 256(2) is to six calendar months and not 180 days - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.