Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Compliance of Rule 46A of IT Rules, 1962 – Admission of additioinal evidence - such exceptional circumstances the requirement of Sub-rule (3) may be dispensed with – thus, there is no merit in the grounds raised by the Revenue - AT
Compliance of Rule 46A of IT Rules, 1962 – Admission of additioinal evidence - such exceptional circumstances the requirement of Sub-rule (3) may be dispensed with – thus, there is no merit in the grounds raised by the Revenue - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
