Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of para 2.3 of FTP and Para 8.3.6 of the HOP - Power of DGFT - Power to frame Duty Draw Back Rules - powers conferred under Section 19 cannot be re-delegated to the DGFT as expressly prohibited under Section 6(3) of the Act - HC
Validity of para 2.3 of FTP and Para 8.3.6 of the HOP - Power of DGFT - Power to frame Duty Draw Back Rules - powers conferred under Section 19 cannot be re-delegated to the DGFT as expressly prohibited under Section 6(3) of the Act - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.