Personal hearing requirements in GST adjudication were satisfied by prior opportunities and written submissions; appellate limitation received writ-pe...
Instead of terminating the proceedings initiated u/s 148 of the Act by dropping them the revenue chose inexplicably to keep those proceedings alive - This amounts to nothing but harassment of the petitioner - HC
Instead of terminating the proceedings initiated u/s 148 of the Act by dropping them the revenue chose inexplicably to keep those proceedings alive - This amounts to nothing but harassment of the petitioner - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.