Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Permanent Establishment – Chargeability of payments received u/s 9(1)(vii) r.w section 115A and 44DA of the Act - The taxpayer had a fixed place PE in India because RRIL’s premises were ‘available’ to all of employees and assessee paid all the expenses in maintaining its premises - AAR
Permanent Establishment – Chargeability of payments received u/s 9(1)(vii) r.w section 115A and 44DA of the Act - The taxpayer had a fixed place PE in India because RRIL’s premises were ‘available’ to all of employees and assessee paid all the expenses in maintaining its premises - AAR
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.