Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Allowance u/s 37(1) - Expenditure pertaining to the payment made to Canara Bank on the direction of DRT, the hypothecation defalcation - any damages allowed in this behalf even referred to as penal by DRT, do not constitute payment for infraction of law - AT
Allowance u/s 37(1) - Expenditure pertaining to the payment made to Canara Bank on the direction of DRT, the hypothecation defalcation - any damages allowed in this behalf even referred to as penal by DRT, do not constitute payment for infraction of law - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.