Habeas corpus challenge to arrest safeguards remains maintainable, but substantial compliance with reasons-to-believe requirement defeats the petition...
Refund Claim – Pre-deposits made by holding company - the appellant was a subsidiary of GSIL and now both have become one company and on the ground that amount was paid by GSIL and not by the appellant, refund cannot be denied - AT
Refund Claim – Pre-deposits made by holding company - the appellant was a subsidiary of GSIL and now both have become one company and on the ground that amount was paid by GSIL and not by the appellant, refund cannot be denied - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.