Unregistered profit-sharing agreements cannot justify occupation of corporate debtor premises during CIRP; repossession by the Resolution Professional...
Refund - there is no dispute that the duty was initially collected by the appellant from their customers, who had also availed cenvat credit and it was only subsequently that debit note were issued the lower authorities have rightly held the refund claim to be hit by the bar of unjust enrichment - AT
Refund - there is no dispute that the duty was initially collected by the appellant from their customers, who had also availed cenvat credit and it was only subsequently that debit note were issued the lower authorities have rightly held the refund claim to be hit by the bar of unjust enrichment - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
