Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
There is constant non-appearance of the appellant before this Tribunal - appeal is liable for dismissal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - AT
There is constant non-appearance of the appellant before this Tribunal - appeal is liable for dismissal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.