Equivalent value attachment under money laundering law upheld where received funds were treated as proceeds of crime and prior-acquired property could...
There is constant non-appearance of the appellant before this Tribunal - appeal is liable for dismissal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - AT
There is constant non-appearance of the appellant before this Tribunal - appeal is liable for dismissal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.