Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Validity of proviso to Rule 8 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 - It was apparent that having failed to substantiate his case before the Adjudicating Authority, instead of filing the appeal the petitioner was taking a chance in the High Court to challenging the vires of the proviso - HC
Validity of proviso to Rule 8 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 - It was apparent that having failed to substantiate his case before the Adjudicating Authority, instead of filing the appeal the petitioner was taking a chance in the High Court to challenging the vires of the proviso - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.