Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Validity of proviso to Rule 8 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 - It was apparent that having failed to substantiate his case before the Adjudicating Authority, instead of filing the appeal the petitioner was taking a chance in the High Court to challenging the vires of the proviso - HC
Validity of proviso to Rule 8 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 - It was apparent that having failed to substantiate his case before the Adjudicating Authority, instead of filing the appeal the petitioner was taking a chance in the High Court to challenging the vires of the proviso - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.