Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
Finality of tax liability was central to the closure of criminal prosecution. The liability dispute had not become final when the Trial Court closed the prosecution; the tax demand was determined, accepted and complied with only afterwards. Closure on the premise that the liability had already been fully satisfied therefore failed to account for material subsequent developments. The closure order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Trial Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law, without any view on the merits of the criminal prosecution.
Finality of tax liability was central to the closure of criminal prosecution. The liability dispute had not become final when the Trial Court closed the prosecution; the tax demand was determined, accepted and complied with only afterwards. Closure on the premise that the liability had already been fully satisfied therefore failed to account for material subsequent developments. The closure order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Trial Court for fresh consideration in accordance with law, without any view on the merits of the criminal prosecution.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.