Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Under the Customs Act, the absence of a separate written show-cause notice within the period contemplated for seizure does not by itself require unconditional release of detained gold bars, because an oral notice may be given at the concerned person's request. Whether an oral notice was actually given, whether grounds were communicated, and whether statutory notice requirements were met depends on the contemporaneous record. Challenges to the voluntariness and evidentiary value of a statement involve disputed factual matters requiring evidentiary assessment. Unconditional release was therefore not directed; the competent adjudicating authority must provide a personal hearing and determine the notice-compliance and statement objections within the stipulated period.
Under the Customs Act, the absence of a separate written show-cause notice within the period contemplated for seizure does not by itself require unconditional release of detained gold bars, because an oral notice may be given at the concerned person's request. Whether an oral notice was actually given, whether grounds were communicated, and whether statutory notice requirements were met depends on the contemporaneous record. Challenges to the voluntariness and evidentiary value of a statement involve disputed factual matters requiring evidentiary assessment. Unconditional release was therefore not directed; the competent adjudicating authority must provide a personal hearing and determine the notice-compliance and statement objections within the stipulated period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.