Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
PMLA adjudication permits a single-member Adjudicating Authority constituted by its Chairperson to include a non-judicial member, because attachment scrutiny does not transfer High Court functions and appellate review remains available. Provisional attachment requires recorded reasons to believe that non-attachment may frustrate proceedings; factual challenges to that satisfaction lie through the statutory appellate process. The Adjudicating Authority must independently record reasons to believe that a person possesses proceeds of crime before issuing notice. Properties acquired before the scheduled offence may also be attached in proceeds-of-crime proceedings. Challenges to the single-member order, attachment reasons, independent satisfaction and pre-offence property attachment were rejected in writ jurisdiction.
PMLA adjudication permits a single-member Adjudicating Authority constituted by its Chairperson to include a non-judicial member, because attachment scrutiny does not transfer High Court functions and appellate review remains available. Provisional attachment requires recorded reasons to believe that non-attachment may frustrate proceedings; factual challenges to that satisfaction lie through the statutory appellate process. The Adjudicating Authority must independently record reasons to believe that a person possesses proceeds of crime before issuing notice. Properties acquired before the scheduled offence may also be attached in proceeds-of-crime proceedings. Challenges to the single-member order, attachment reasons, independent satisfaction and pre-offence property attachment were rejected in writ jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.