Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CENVAT credit on input services received at premises omitted from a centralised registration cannot be denied solely because those premises are unregistered. In contrast, works contract services used to construct or set up BPO branches fall within the exclusion for construction of buildings or civil structures, making related credit inadmissible. Where disputed credit was disclosed in ST-3 returns and refund claims, audit detection alone does not establish suppression or other conditions for extended limitation; recovery is confined to the normal period and requires recomputation. Interest follows on recoverable inadmissible credit, but penalties based on suppression or failure to include premises are unsustainable without the requisite contravention or intent to evade.
CENVAT credit on input services received at premises omitted from a centralised registration cannot be denied solely because those premises are unregistered. In contrast, works contract services used to construct or set up BPO branches fall within the exclusion for construction of buildings or civil structures, making related credit inadmissible. Where disputed credit was disclosed in ST-3 returns and refund claims, audit detection alone does not establish suppression or other conditions for extended limitation; recovery is confined to the normal period and requires recomputation. Interest follows on recoverable inadmissible credit, but penalties based on suppression or failure to include premises are unsustainable without the requisite contravention or intent to evade.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.