Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Tax deduction at source under section 194C applies to External...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudication.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Tax deduction at source under section 194C applies to External Development Charges paid to the urban development authority, rendering the payer liable for non-deduction, subject to the pending Supreme Court proceedings. Payments later characterised as administrative charges for changes in beneficial interest and development rights require verification of the supporting evidence, the applicable State scheme, the payments' nature, and any resulting obligations under Chapter XVII-B. Those disputed payments require de novo determination by the Assessing Officer after admission of evidence and an adequate hearing. The Revenue's position succeeded on External Development Charges, while the remaining TDS issue was restored for fresh adjudication.
Tax deduction at source under section 194C applies to External Development Charges paid to the urban development authority, rendering the payer liable for non-deduction, subject to the pending Supreme Court proceedings. Payments later characterised as administrative charges for changes in beneficial interest and development rights require verification of the supporting evidence, the applicable State scheme, the payments' nature, and any resulting obligations under Chapter XVII-B. Those disputed payments require de novo determination by the Assessing Officer after admission of evidence and an adequate hearing. The Revenue's position succeeded on External Development Charges, while the remaining TDS issue was restored for fresh adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
