Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Live broadcasting rights, characterised as a one-time transmission without an enduring benefit, are neither a scientific work nor rights in which copyright subsists. Licence fees for those rights therefore fall outside royalty treatment under the India-UK DTAA, unlike non-live repeat telecasts and highlights. A mutually agreed allocation of broadcasting fees between live and non-live rights remains valid absent material showing that the allocation is unjustified. Release fees received for permitting athletes to participate in a league, being separate from player remuneration and not arising from athletes' personal activities, fall outside the athlete-income provision of the India-UK DTAA.
Live broadcasting rights, characterised as a one-time transmission without an enduring benefit, are neither a scientific work nor rights in which copyright subsists. Licence fees for those rights therefore fall outside royalty treatment under the India-UK DTAA, unlike non-live repeat telecasts and highlights. A mutually agreed allocation of broadcasting fees between live and non-live rights remains valid absent material showing that the allocation is unjustified. Release fees received for permitting athletes to participate in a league, being separate from player remuneration and not arising from athletes' personal activities, fall outside the athlete-income provision of the India-UK DTAA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
