Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Capital-gains computation for an unquoted equity-share transfer uses the consideration actually received or accruing from that transfer; a notional value may replace it only under an express statutory fiction. The prescribed fair-market-value substitution did not apply where the declared consideration exceeded fair market value. Demat records and contemporaneous delivery instructions established completion of the earlier transfer, and later settlement of the purchaser's liability could not alter its transfer date or consideration. A subsequent transfer under a different ownership and contractual structure could not substitute its consideration for the earlier transaction, particularly where conditions had not crystallised the final price. The capital-gains addition was therefore deleted.
Capital-gains computation for an unquoted equity-share transfer uses the consideration actually received or accruing from that transfer; a notional value may replace it only under an express statutory fiction. The prescribed fair-market-value substitution did not apply where the declared consideration exceeded fair market value. Demat records and contemporaneous delivery instructions established completion of the earlier transfer, and later settlement of the purchaser's liability could not alter its transfer date or consideration. A subsequent transfer under a different ownership and contractual structure could not substitute its consideration for the earlier transaction, particularly where conditions had not crystallised the final price. The capital-gains addition was therefore deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.