Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revenue cannot treat Business Auxiliary Services supplied to a foreign recipient as non-exported for Rule 5 CENVAT-credit refund purposes while not seeking recovery of service tax on the inconsistent premise that those same services were taxable in India. Category III services supplied in relation to business or commerce qualify as exports where the recipient is outside India and the benefit accrues outside India, even if activities are performed in India. Accumulated CENVAT-credit refund claims are therefore admissible for qualifying services.
Revenue cannot treat Business Auxiliary Services supplied to a foreign recipient as non-exported for Rule 5 CENVAT-credit refund purposes while not seeking recovery of service tax on the inconsistent premise that those same services were taxable in India. Category III services supplied in relation to business or commerce qualify as exports where the recipient is outside India and the benefit accrues outside India, even if activities are performed in India. Accumulated CENVAT-credit refund claims are therefore admissible for qualifying services.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.