Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Detention of goods for alleged reuse of an e-way bill requires cogent evidence that the same goods had completed an earlier journey and that the e-way bill was reused. Where goods are accompanied by an invoice, e-invoice and e-way bill, with no discrepancy in description, quantity, value or ownership, an earlier vehicle verification or location alone cannot establish re-transportation. Contravention of GST law and intention to evade tax cannot be presumed from suspicion; the department must prove both by independent evidence. On these facts, the detention and penalty proceedings were set aside, and refund of the deposited amount was directed in accordance with law.
Detention of goods for alleged reuse of an e-way bill requires cogent evidence that the same goods had completed an earlier journey and that the e-way bill was reused. Where goods are accompanied by an invoice, e-invoice and e-way bill, with no discrepancy in description, quantity, value or ownership, an earlier vehicle verification or location alone cannot establish re-transportation. Contravention of GST law and intention to evade tax cannot be presumed from suspicion; the department must prove both by independent evidence. On these facts, the detention and penalty proceedings were set aside, and refund of the deposited amount was directed in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
