Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Numerical entries in seized records may be read by appending zeros only where the interpretation is supported by the nature of the entries and surrounding material. The High Court restored the addition based on the Commissioner (Appeals)' reasoned interpretation of pages 4 and 5 of Annexure B-3, holding that the Tribunal could not append a single zero after rejecting larger multipliers without reasons. Additions for unexplained investment and undisclosed profit from other rough-diamond entries were deleted because those transactions had already been considered for taxation in another entity's assessment and the assessee lacked financial capacity to conduct the business independently. Revenue appeals were partly allowed.
Numerical entries in seized records may be read by appending zeros only where the interpretation is supported by the nature of the entries and surrounding material. The High Court restored the addition based on the Commissioner (Appeals)' reasoned interpretation of pages 4 and 5 of Annexure B-3, holding that the Tribunal could not append a single zero after rejecting larger multipliers without reasons. Additions for unexplained investment and undisclosed profit from other rough-diamond entries were deleted because those transactions had already been considered for taxation in another entity's assessment and the assessee lacked financial capacity to conduct the business independently. Revenue appeals were partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
