Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Transfer-pricing provisions apply to transactions between...
Transfer-pricing rules cannot benchmark independently agreed royalty payments without evidence of an associated-enterprise relationship, requiring deletion of disallowance.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer-pricing provisions apply to transactions between associated enterprises and cannot be used to benchmark royalty paid to an independent foreign licensor unless material establishes a deemed associated-enterprise relationship through a prior agreement or specific arrangement. Where the licensor was not disclosed as related and no such material existed, the royalty transaction remained independent. A bona fide royalty rate agreed under a licence agreement could not be disallowed under section 37 merely because it was considered excessive by reference to external royalty comparables. The royalty disallowance was deleted; remaining grounds were left open.
Transfer-pricing provisions apply to transactions between associated enterprises and cannot be used to benchmark royalty paid to an independent foreign licensor unless material establishes a deemed associated-enterprise relationship through a prior agreement or specific arrangement. Where the licensor was not disclosed as related and no such material existed, the royalty transaction remained independent. A bona fide royalty rate agreed under a licence agreement could not be disallowed under section 37 merely because it was considered excessive by reference to external royalty comparables. The royalty disallowance was deleted; remaining grounds were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.