Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Centralised assessment transfer becomes unwarranted once the searched person's assessment is complete, requiring restoration to the appropriate charge...
Transfer-pricing provisions apply to transactions between...
Transfer-pricing rules cannot benchmark independently agreed royalty payments without evidence of an associated-enterprise relationship, requiring deletion of disallowance.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer-pricing provisions apply to transactions between associated enterprises and cannot be used to benchmark royalty paid to an independent foreign licensor unless material establishes a deemed associated-enterprise relationship through a prior agreement or specific arrangement. Where the licensor was not disclosed as related and no such material existed, the royalty transaction remained independent. A bona fide royalty rate agreed under a licence agreement could not be disallowed under section 37 merely because it was considered excessive by reference to external royalty comparables. The royalty disallowance was deleted; remaining grounds were left open.
Transfer-pricing provisions apply to transactions between associated enterprises and cannot be used to benchmark royalty paid to an independent foreign licensor unless material establishes a deemed associated-enterprise relationship through a prior agreement or specific arrangement. Where the licensor was not disclosed as related and no such material existed, the royalty transaction remained independent. A bona fide royalty rate agreed under a licence agreement could not be disallowed under section 37 merely because it was considered excessive by reference to external royalty comparables. The royalty disallowance was deleted; remaining grounds were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
