Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Rectification of DRP directions that changed AMP benchmarking from the earlier approach to intensity-adjusted TNMM, on the CIT(DR)'s application, was unsustainable; the rectified directions and consequential assessment order were set aside. Original DRP directions requiring deletion of a protective AMP adjustment bound the assessment proceedings, so the protective adjustment based on the Bright Line Test was also set aside. AMP transfer-pricing adjustments derived through both the Bright Line Test and intensity-adjusted TNMM were unsustainable for the relevant year and corresponding subsequent years. The impugned assessment orders were set aside, while academic, consequential and unpressed grounds remained open or were not pressed.
Rectification of DRP directions that changed AMP benchmarking from the earlier approach to intensity-adjusted TNMM, on the CIT(DR)'s application, was unsustainable; the rectified directions and consequential assessment order were set aside. Original DRP directions requiring deletion of a protective AMP adjustment bound the assessment proceedings, so the protective adjustment based on the Bright Line Test was also set aside. AMP transfer-pricing adjustments derived through both the Bright Line Test and intensity-adjusted TNMM were unsustainable for the relevant year and corresponding subsequent years. The impugned assessment orders were set aside, while academic, consequential and unpressed grounds remained open or were not pressed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.