Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rectification of DRP directions that changed AMP benchmarking from the earlier approach to intensity-adjusted TNMM, on the CIT(DR)'s application, was unsustainable; the rectified directions and consequential assessment order were set aside. Original DRP directions requiring deletion of a protective AMP adjustment bound the assessment proceedings, so the protective adjustment based on the Bright Line Test was also set aside. AMP transfer-pricing adjustments derived through both the Bright Line Test and intensity-adjusted TNMM were unsustainable for the relevant year and corresponding subsequent years. The impugned assessment orders were set aside, while academic, consequential and unpressed grounds remained open or were not pressed.
Rectification of DRP directions that changed AMP benchmarking from the earlier approach to intensity-adjusted TNMM, on the CIT(DR)'s application, was unsustainable; the rectified directions and consequential assessment order were set aside. Original DRP directions requiring deletion of a protective AMP adjustment bound the assessment proceedings, so the protective adjustment based on the Bright Line Test was also set aside. AMP transfer-pricing adjustments derived through both the Bright Line Test and intensity-adjusted TNMM were unsustainable for the relevant year and corresponding subsequent years. The impugned assessment orders were set aside, while academic, consequential and unpressed grounds remained open or were not pressed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.