Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
961 to 980 of 96508 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CENVAT credit on qualifying capital goods remains available where an EPC contractor purchases the goods, invoices name the manufacturer as consignee, and the goods are received in the factory for installing a captive cogeneration plant indispensable to manufacture. Entitlement does not depend on the manufacturer owning the goods at receipt or purchasing them directly. Incorporation of the goods into an immovable captive plant after installation does not negate credit. Denial of credit solely because the contractor procured the capital goods is therefore unwarranted, and penalty does not arise on that basis.
CENVAT credit on qualifying capital goods remains available where an EPC contractor purchases the goods, invoices name the manufacturer as consignee, and the goods are received in the factory for installing a captive cogeneration plant indispensable to manufacture. Entitlement does not depend on the manufacturer owning the goods at receipt or purchasing them directly. Incorporation of the goods into an immovable captive plant after installation does not negate credit. Denial of credit solely because the contractor procured the capital goods is therefore unwarranted, and penalty does not arise on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.