Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
CENVAT credit on qualifying capital goods remains available where an EPC contractor purchases the goods, invoices name the manufacturer as consignee, and the goods are received in the factory for installing a captive cogeneration plant indispensable to manufacture. Entitlement does not depend on the manufacturer owning the goods at receipt or purchasing them directly. Incorporation of the goods into an immovable captive plant after installation does not negate credit. Denial of credit solely because the contractor procured the capital goods is therefore unwarranted, and penalty does not arise on that basis.
CENVAT credit on qualifying capital goods remains available where an EPC contractor purchases the goods, invoices name the manufacturer as consignee, and the goods are received in the factory for installing a captive cogeneration plant indispensable to manufacture. Entitlement does not depend on the manufacturer owning the goods at receipt or purchasing them directly. Incorporation of the goods into an immovable captive plant after installation does not negate credit. Denial of credit solely because the contractor procured the capital goods is therefore unwarranted, and penalty does not arise on that basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.