Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Regular bail in alleged fraudulent input tax credit availment through fake invoices depends on more than the seriousness of an economic offence. Relevant considerations include custody period, maximum punishment, the nature of evidence, risk of evidence tampering or witness influence, cooperation with trial, prior antecedents, and the likelihood of early trial completion. The High Court found that the accused had spent about four months in custody, faced a maximum five-year sentence, had no antecedents, and confronted documentary evidence, with no material showing interference risk. Bail was granted on bonds, subject to conditions against interfering with proceedings, requiring address updates, and restricting foreign travel without permission.
Regular bail in alleged fraudulent input tax credit availment through fake invoices depends on more than the seriousness of an economic offence. Relevant considerations include custody period, maximum punishment, the nature of evidence, risk of evidence tampering or witness influence, cooperation with trial, prior antecedents, and the likelihood of early trial completion. The High Court found that the accused had spent about four months in custody, faced a maximum five-year sentence, had no antecedents, and confronted documentary evidence, with no material showing interference risk. Bail was granted on bonds, subject to conditions against interfering with proceedings, requiring address updates, and restricting foreign travel without permission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
