Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
E-Way Bill requirements extend to movement of goods for reasons other than supply, including return of an excavator from a work site to registered premises. Ownership and return to the owner's premises do not independently remove that requirement. A short-distance exemption must be established with satisfactory evidence that the movement falls within Rule 138(14) or an applicable notification. Failure to prove the exemption, or to clarify the tax treatment of consideration for use of the equipment, may prevent the breach from being treated as merely procedural and may support tax-evasion consequences under CGST/UPGST enforcement provisions.
E-Way Bill requirements extend to movement of goods for reasons other than supply, including return of an excavator from a work site to registered premises. Ownership and return to the owner's premises do not independently remove that requirement. A short-distance exemption must be established with satisfactory evidence that the movement falls within Rule 138(14) or an applicable notification. Failure to prove the exemption, or to clarify the tax treatment of consideration for use of the equipment, may prevent the breach from being treated as merely procedural and may support tax-evasion consequences under CGST/UPGST enforcement provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.