Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Valuation of consideration for a limited patent-use licence turned on materially divergent expert reports applying an internationally accepted cost approach and a substantially higher departmental valuation. Neither valuation position was accepted in full. A lump-sum estimate was adopted in the interest of justice, expressly without precedential effect, fixing the amount attributable to the limited patent-use right at USD 900,000. Consequential computation was directed in accordance with law, and the appeal was partly allowed to that extent.
Valuation of consideration for a limited patent-use licence turned on materially divergent expert reports applying an internationally accepted cost approach and a substantially higher departmental valuation. Neither valuation position was accepted in full. A lump-sum estimate was adopted in the interest of justice, expressly without precedential effect, fixing the amount attributable to the limited patent-use right at USD 900,000. Consequential computation was directed in accordance with law, and the appeal was partly allowed to that extent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
