Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Jurisdictional defect in an assessment may be raised in collateral penalty proceedings where the assessment was made without a valid notice under section 143(2) from the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. An order made without jurisdiction is a nullity and may be challenged whenever enforcement or reliance is attempted, notwithstanding that the assessment has attained finality. Because the assessment was invalid and non est, the consequential penalty order was quashed.
Jurisdictional defect in an assessment may be raised in collateral penalty proceedings where the assessment was made without a valid notice under section 143(2) from the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. An order made without jurisdiction is a nullity and may be challenged whenever enforcement or reliance is attempted, notwithstanding that the assessment has attained finality. Because the assessment was invalid and non est, the consequential penalty order was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
