Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Where an income-tax refund is due and adjustment against an outstanding demand is proposed under section 245 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the tax department may retain only the amount proposed for adjustment or withholding. It must promptly release the balance refund, without prejudicing either party's right to challenge the legality of the outstanding demand or the proposed adjustment. The balance refund was directed to be credited within the stipulated period; failure to do so would attract interest at the rate directed by the High Court.
Where an income-tax refund is due and adjustment against an outstanding demand is proposed under section 245 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the tax department may retain only the amount proposed for adjustment or withholding. It must promptly release the balance refund, without prejudicing either party's right to challenge the legality of the outstanding demand or the proposed adjustment. The balance refund was directed to be credited within the stipulated period; failure to do so would attract interest at the rate directed by the High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.