Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Charitable payment-system infrastructure operated for public benefit remained eligible for exemption under sections 11 and 12 despite transaction-based fees and surplus generation. Fee collection did not by itself establish commercial activity under the proviso to section 2(15), particularly where services were uniformly available at the same fee. No application of income for the benefit of specified persons was established under section 13(3). On identical facts to an earlier coordinate Bench ruling, exemption was sustained for both assessment years and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Charitable payment-system infrastructure operated for public benefit remained eligible for exemption under sections 11 and 12 despite transaction-based fees and surplus generation. Fee collection did not by itself establish commercial activity under the proviso to section 2(15), particularly where services were uniformly available at the same fee. No application of income for the benefit of specified persons was established under section 13(3). On identical facts to an earlier coordinate Bench ruling, exemption was sustained for both assessment years and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.