Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Charitable payment-system infrastructure operated for public benefit remained eligible for exemption under sections 11 and 12 despite transaction-based fees and surplus generation. Fee collection did not by itself establish commercial activity under the proviso to section 2(15), particularly where services were uniformly available at the same fee. No application of income for the benefit of specified persons was established under section 13(3). On identical facts to an earlier coordinate Bench ruling, exemption was sustained for both assessment years and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Charitable payment-system infrastructure operated for public benefit remained eligible for exemption under sections 11 and 12 despite transaction-based fees and surplus generation. Fee collection did not by itself establish commercial activity under the proviso to section 2(15), particularly where services were uniformly available at the same fee. No application of income for the benefit of specified persons was established under section 13(3). On identical facts to an earlier coordinate Bench ruling, exemption was sustained for both assessment years and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.