Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Transfer pricing requires selection of the most appropriate...
Transfer pricing comparability prioritises reliable external CUPs and foreign-currency LIBOR benchmarks for exports, borrowings and delayed receivables.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Transfer pricing requires selection of the most appropriate method based on transaction nature and comparable-data reliability, with neither CUP nor TNMM having statutory priority. An external CUP based on an associated enterprise's purchases from independent suppliers may be reliable where geographic, volume or timing differences do not materially affect price or can be reasonably adjusted. TNMM may be unreliable without meaningful adjustment for abnormal fixed costs from low capacity utilisation. Foreign-currency borrowings and receivables require currency-specific benchmarking under comparable uncontrolled conditions. Delayed export receivables constitute separate international transactions, with interest benchmarked at LIBOR plus 200 basis points after a 60-day credit period.
Transfer pricing requires selection of the most appropriate method based on transaction nature and comparable-data reliability, with neither CUP nor TNMM having statutory priority. An external CUP based on an associated enterprise's purchases from independent suppliers may be reliable where geographic, volume or timing differences do not materially affect price or can be reasonably adjusted. TNMM may be unreliable without meaningful adjustment for abnormal fixed costs from low capacity utilisation. Foreign-currency borrowings and receivables require currency-specific benchmarking under comparable uncontrolled conditions. Delayed export receivables constitute separate international transactions, with interest benchmarked at LIBOR plus 200 basis points after a 60-day credit period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.