Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reversal of opening accrued and unbilled revenue already recognised and taxed in an earlier year was allowable where an indistinguishable coordinate-bench ruling applied; the related disallowance was deleted. Professional fees paid to non-residents were not established as royalty under the applicable tax treaty. Consequently, non-deduction of tax under section 195 did not justify disallowance, and deletion of that adjustment was sustained. The taxpayer's appeal succeeded, while the Revenue's appeal failed.
Reversal of opening accrued and unbilled revenue already recognised and taxed in an earlier year was allowable where an indistinguishable coordinate-bench ruling applied; the related disallowance was deleted. Professional fees paid to non-residents were not established as royalty under the applicable tax treaty. Consequently, non-deduction of tax under section 195 did not justify disallowance, and deletion of that adjustment was sustained. The taxpayer's appeal succeeded, while the Revenue's appeal failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.