Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1601 to 1620 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty for inaccurate particulars in professional-fee claims requires substantiated expenditure and independent findings supporting concealment or inaccurate particulars. A payment characterised as professional fees but shown to be a loan advanced and repaid, with a corresponding receipt credited to profit and loss, is revenue neutral and does not support disallowance or penalty. Conversely, penalty remains justified where claimed payees deny receipt or payments remain unsubstantiated. Liability to deduct tax on professional fees depends on satisfying the statutory threshold based on gross receipts in the immediately preceding financial year; older receipt data alone is insufficient. Disallowance for non-deduction of tax does not, by itself, justify penalty.
Penalty for inaccurate particulars in professional-fee claims requires substantiated expenditure and independent findings supporting concealment or inaccurate particulars. A payment characterised as professional fees but shown to be a loan advanced and repaid, with a corresponding receipt credited to profit and loss, is revenue neutral and does not support disallowance or penalty. Conversely, penalty remains justified where claimed payees deny receipt or payments remain unsubstantiated. Liability to deduct tax on professional fees depends on satisfying the statutory threshold based on gross receipts in the immediately preceding financial year; older receipt data alone is insufficient. Disallowance for non-deduction of tax does not, by itself, justify penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.