Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Drawback recovery from an exporter whose goods were shipped under another entity's IEC requires evidence that the exporter actually received the drawback; ICES ordinarily credits the IEC holder's bank account. Recovery is an execution proceeding, but interest liability arises only upon proof of payment to that exporter. Goods already taken outside India are exported goods, not export goods liable to confiscation under section 113, so consequential section 114 penalties fail. Export through another person's IEC may breach foreign trade law, but section 114AA penalties require evidence of knowing or intentional use of materially false customs declarations or documents. The Tribunal set aside recovery and penalties, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.
Drawback recovery from an exporter whose goods were shipped under another entity's IEC requires evidence that the exporter actually received the drawback; ICES ordinarily credits the IEC holder's bank account. Recovery is an execution proceeding, but interest liability arises only upon proof of payment to that exporter. Goods already taken outside India are exported goods, not export goods liable to confiscation under section 113, so consequential section 114 penalties fail. Export through another person's IEC may breach foreign trade law, but section 114AA penalties require evidence of knowing or intentional use of materially false customs declarations or documents. The Tribunal set aside recovery and penalties, allowing the appeals with consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.