Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1601 to 1620 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfers of a corporate debtor's funds during the CIRP moratorium are prohibited where made without the Resolution Professional's knowledge, and transferred amounts may be directed to be remitted. Public announcement and publication of CIRP proceedings create deemed knowledge of the moratorium, preventing a recipient from relying on ignorance as a defence. A claim that transferred funds were held in trust requires proof of a trust relationship and a basis for identifying the funds as trust money; an unsupported assertion is insufficient. Proceedings for a moratorium breach may be pursued under Section 60(5) read with Section 14(1)(b). Reliance on Section 74 was unavailable where it was not previously pleaded and had been omitted by the 2026 amendment.
Transfers of a corporate debtor's funds during the CIRP moratorium are prohibited where made without the Resolution Professional's knowledge, and transferred amounts may be directed to be remitted. Public announcement and publication of CIRP proceedings create deemed knowledge of the moratorium, preventing a recipient from relying on ignorance as a defence. A claim that transferred funds were held in trust requires proof of a trust relationship and a basis for identifying the funds as trust money; an unsupported assertion is insufficient. Proceedings for a moratorium breach may be pursued under Section 60(5) read with Section 14(1)(b). Reliance on Section 74 was unavailable where it was not previously pleaded and had been omitted by the 2026 amendment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.