Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Continuation of a pre-liquidation aircraft sale process is not barred merely because liquidation begins, where the sale had been approved during the insolvency process and was later adopted by the Stakeholders' Consultation Committee. No material irregularity or illegality was established in completing the sale. Former employees could not challenge the transaction on that basis; their entitlement remained limited to recovery of dues under the statutory liquidation waterfall. The challenge to the sale and the related order was dismissed.
Continuation of a pre-liquidation aircraft sale process is not barred merely because liquidation begins, where the sale had been approved during the insolvency process and was later adopted by the Stakeholders' Consultation Committee. No material irregularity or illegality was established in completing the sale. Former employees could not challenge the transaction on that basis; their entitlement remained limited to recovery of dues under the statutory liquidation waterfall. The challenge to the sale and the related order was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.