Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Limitation for a personal guarantor's insolvency application begins when the guarantee is invoked. Section 18 of the Limitation Act creates a fresh limitation period only through a written acknowledgment by the party against whom the creditor asserts the right. A personal guarantor cannot rely on unilateral one-time settlement proposals to extend limitation for an application filed by the guarantor; those proposals may operate as admissions usable by the creditor against the guarantor. The Section 94 application was therefore time-barred, and dismissal of both the application and the challenge to the auction notice was upheld.
Limitation for a personal guarantor's insolvency application begins when the guarantee is invoked. Section 18 of the Limitation Act creates a fresh limitation period only through a written acknowledgment by the party against whom the creditor asserts the right. A personal guarantor cannot rely on unilateral one-time settlement proposals to extend limitation for an application filed by the guarantor; those proposals may operate as admissions usable by the creditor against the guarantor. The Section 94 application was therefore time-barred, and dismissal of both the application and the challenge to the auction notice was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.