Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4816
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
641 to 660 of 96301 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Customs seizure safeguards require more than a panchnama...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an invalidated circular.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Customs seizure safeguards require more than a panchnama restricting dealings with an imported vehicle. Such a panchnama constitutes detention, not lawful seizure, unless a separate reasoned order records belief that the goods are liable to confiscation and, where physical seizure is impracticable, satisfaction under the applicable proviso. Authorities cannot retain goods indefinitely as detained and later issue a seizure memo to bypass limitation for a confiscation notice; without a lawful contemporaneous seizure order, limitation runs from actual detention. Provisional-release conditions founded on an invalidated circular provision are illegal. Release of the imported vehicle was directed, with costs imposed.
Customs seizure safeguards require more than a panchnama restricting dealings with an imported vehicle. Such a panchnama constitutes detention, not lawful seizure, unless a separate reasoned order records belief that the goods are liable to confiscation and, where physical seizure is impracticable, satisfaction under the applicable proviso. Authorities cannot retain goods indefinitely as detained and later issue a seizure memo to bypass limitation for a confiscation notice; without a lawful contemporaneous seizure order, limitation runs from actual detention. Provisional-release conditions founded on an invalidated circular provision are illegal. Release of the imported vehicle was directed, with costs imposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.