Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment of a partner cannot rest on notional interest on capital or remuneration where the partnership deed merely enables, rather than mandates, those payments. Clauses subject to mutual agreement, including a subsequent amendment providing that no interest was payable, did not establish an enforceable entitlement or actual receipt by the partner. Without material showing that the partner received interest or remuneration, there was no basis to infer income escaping assessment. The High Court therefore quashed the reassessment notices issued to the partner.
Reassessment of a partner cannot rest on notional interest on capital or remuneration where the partnership deed merely enables, rather than mandates, those payments. Clauses subject to mutual agreement, including a subsequent amendment providing that no interest was payable, did not establish an enforceable entitlement or actual receipt by the partner. Without material showing that the partner received interest or remuneration, there was no basis to infer income escaping assessment. The High Court therefore quashed the reassessment notices issued to the partner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
