Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Professional income cannot be assessed by treating an entire doctor's gross receipts as net income solely because no return was filed. For a reasonable assessment, the taxpayer's offer of 50% of receipts as income, tax payment on that basis, and Revenue acceptance of the same approach in subsequent years for the identical profession were relevant, although they did not establish formal eligibility for presumptive taxation under section 44ADA for the relevant year. The Tribunal did not decide whether section 44ADA could be claimed without filing a return. Professional income was restricted to 50% of gross receipts; unpressed grounds were dismissed.
Professional income cannot be assessed by treating an entire doctor's gross receipts as net income solely because no return was filed. For a reasonable assessment, the taxpayer's offer of 50% of receipts as income, tax payment on that basis, and Revenue acceptance of the same approach in subsequent years for the identical profession were relevant, although they did not establish formal eligibility for presumptive taxation under section 44ADA for the relevant year. The Tribunal did not decide whether section 44ADA could be claimed without filing a return. Professional income was restricted to 50% of gross receipts; unpressed grounds were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.