Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Actuarial deficit contributions made to an approved superannuation fund to align fund assets with actuarial liabilities are distinguished from ordinary annual or initial contributions. Because their purpose is to remedy an actuarial shortfall, they are not subject to the Rule 87 ceiling on annual contributions, preserving the fund's solvency. Similarly, contributions bridging actuarial liability and available assets in an approved gratuity fund are not ordinary annual contributions subject to the Rule 103 ceiling. Unless approval is formally withdrawn, the assessing authority must accept the fund's approved status and cannot, during assessment, question compliance with the Rules to restrict the deduction.
Actuarial deficit contributions made to an approved superannuation fund to align fund assets with actuarial liabilities are distinguished from ordinary annual or initial contributions. Because their purpose is to remedy an actuarial shortfall, they are not subject to the Rule 87 ceiling on annual contributions, preserving the fund's solvency. Similarly, contributions bridging actuarial liability and available assets in an approved gratuity fund are not ordinary annual contributions subject to the Rule 103 ceiling. Unless approval is formally withdrawn, the assessing authority must accept the fund's approved status and cannot, during assessment, question compliance with the Rules to restrict the deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.