Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Extended limitation for sale of attached immovable property operates retrospectively as a procedural amendment only where the original limitation had not expired when the amendment took effect; it cannot revive already time-barred recovery claims. The seven-year period therefore applied to later assessment years whose unamended limitation remained alive, while sale proceedings for earlier time-barred years were barred. Tax Recovery Officer functions concerning attachment, sale proclamation and setting aside sales are quasi-judicial, allowing exclusion of the Supreme Court-prescribed COVID-19 limitation period and court-ordered stay periods. Where no appeal is filed, limitation under Rule 68B begins after expiry of the notice-of-demand period, when the assessment becomes final for recovery purposes.
Extended limitation for sale of attached immovable property operates retrospectively as a procedural amendment only where the original limitation had not expired when the amendment took effect; it cannot revive already time-barred recovery claims. The seven-year period therefore applied to later assessment years whose unamended limitation remained alive, while sale proceedings for earlier time-barred years were barred. Tax Recovery Officer functions concerning attachment, sale proclamation and setting aside sales are quasi-judicial, allowing exclusion of the Supreme Court-prescribed COVID-19 limitation period and court-ordered stay periods. Where no appeal is filed, limitation under Rule 68B begins after expiry of the notice-of-demand period, when the assessment becomes final for recovery purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.